The honeymoon is over for Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg. In fact, it ended before it began.
Facebook’s long-awaited and much hyped IPO is less than a week old and the blame game is on as the company has lost nearly 20% of its value since the initial offering.
After three days of trading Wall Street’s take on Facebook has gone from jubilant to jaundiced.
The stock ended its first full day of trading at $38.23 – essentially flat from its $38 opening price though it did manage to set an IPO record for the sheer volume of trades — 567 million shares on opening day last Friday. Investors hoped for a turnaround. That never materialized. On Monday, a selloff prompted the shares to fall by nearly 11%, ending at $34.03. The news worsened Tuesday. The stock sank another eight percent down trading in the $31 – $32 range.
Investors were quick to assign blame. And they didn’t have far to look. According to Reuters, Facebook’s lead banking underwriters, Morgan Stanley (MS), JP Morgan (JPM), and Goldman Sachs (GS) all slashed their Facebook earnings forecasts “in the middle of the IPO road show.” The underwriter analysts cut their estimates after Facebook issued an amended IPO prospectus, in which the company used vague language to state that the number of users was growing faster than revenue. That was a big red flag. But the worst part of this story is that the sales slippage was only disclosed to a select few underwriters and not the public-at-large who were eager to cash in on what they thought would be a great deal.
Industry Calls for SEC to Widen Facebook Probe
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is already investigating last Friday’s glitches that delayed Facebook being traded on the NASDAQ exchange for about an hour. Now industry watchers are calling for the SEC to widen its probe as to why there was not a full disclosure about Facebook’s lower earnings forecast in advance of the IPO. The failure to reveal the sales and earnings slowdown helped make Facebook the second largest IPO in U.S. history behind Visa. Regardless of any actions by the SEC the takeaway is: Zuckerberg and Facebook executives became instant millionaires and the average investor loses, because the company was overvalued.
Can Facebook do anything to reverse the initial slide and avoid a backlash that could cause it to sink even deeper? The company must at least attempt to live up to the hyperbole. As a public company with a very high profile Facebook is answerable to shareholders and investors. The slightest fluctuation in the stock price – or worse, yet continued downward spiral – will be analyzed and second guessed as witnessed by the headlines and commentary.
It is imperative for Facebook to quickly find ways to:
- Expand its user base beyond the current 900+ million users by attracting new users internationally.
- Monetize and productize its services
- Build a cogent, compelling and cohesive mobility strategy that includes mobile applications
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg who’s firmly in charge with 56% ownership, realizes this. That’s why he, his executives and engineers engaged in an all-night “hackathon” at Facebook’s Menlo Park, CA headquarters brainstorming on ideas to attract new users and coding software that could potentially enrich the company’s coffers.
Investors will be more anxious than ever to see Facebook’s short term tactical and long term strategic plans to grow the company and swell the ranks of the 900 million current users – particularly in international markets. Established competitors like Google and newcomers like Pinterest will also be keeping a close eye on Facebook’s fortunes. Facebook’s must move quickly and decisively to put the billions it made in its IPO to work immediately before the stock declines further. Zuckerberg must continue to grow the company, develop new products to sustain and expand profitability and avoid being a flash-in-the-pan.
Facebook’s Growth Strategies: Organic and by Acquisition
Growth comes from two avenues: organic in which companies develop their own applications and products, and by acquisition in which they purchase expertise and immediate credibility and entrée into new markets. Facebook must do both.
The global economic climate remains challenging. Many of the top tier high technology firms, including Google, HP, IBM and Oracle have made large, high profile acquisitions. Google for example, has spent over $10 million (US dollars) purchasing nearly 200 firms since its 2004 IPO. Those figures don’t include Google’s still-pending $12.5 billion acquisition of cell phone maker Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc., which just received regulatory approval in China.
Facebook’s most notable acquisition to date has been the $1 billion purchase of Instagram, which makes a mobile photo application.
That’s a start. The type of company Facebook elects to invest in or purchase is equally important. Mobility is unquestionably one of the most lucrative and hotly contested vertical markets. As a mobile photo application, Instagram has the potential to appeal to both consumer and corporate users. And Instagram is also less likely to fall prey to the fickleness that is so pervasive in gaming applications which typically have the greatest appeal among young users. Facebook could conceivably ink a deal with a wireless carrier to charge fees to transfer photos and photo albums on mobile phones and tablets. For Facebook to play successfully in the big leagues and challenge the likes of Google it will have to make targeted acquisitions in the mobility space that will enhance its current offerings to ensure a continuing, solid revenue stream.
Facebook’s most daunting challenge in both the near and long term is how to monetize its existing base of users. The obvious answer is to drive greater advertising revenues. One way to do this is to more closely track and sell user information and preferences. However, that strategy is risky and could backfire. Last week, US automaker General Motors (GM) dealt Facebook a blow when it announced it would withdraw its ads from the social media site. According to GM, it did not realize the hoped-for return on investment, from new car sales. This signals that corporate giants still view Facebook as largely a social media site geared more towards entertainment and games sales. The company also suffered a recent setback on the consumer games front. CrowdStar, one of its biggest developers, said last month it would stop making new consumer games for Facebook. Instead, CrowdStar will now focus on creating mobile games.
A study released by WordStream last week found that Facebook’s ads do not yet support mobile advertising and d that its click-through rate is “under 0.05 percent, about half the average CTR for banner ads across the Internet, thus earning a grade of B+ compared to Google’s A.” WordStream founder and chief technology officers (CTO) Larry Kim, was openly critical of Facebook’s prospect in an open letter to investors, stating, “So far, Facebook’s advertising platform hasn’t kept pace with the explosive growth of its social network, and it remains to be seen if CEO Mark Zuckerberg even wants to focus on advertising as a source of revenue,” Kim said. The study gave Facebook only a “C” grade for targeting ads noting that it earns “no significant revenue” from its mobile applications used by 425 million people on iPhones and Androids each month.
Facebook must find a way to turn this around. As the majority stakeholder with veto power over minority investors, Zuckerberg must convince Wall Street and the industry-at-large that he and Facebook are more than just a social network aimed primarily at the under 21-crowd. Several critics focused on Zuckerberg’s dressed down appearance and his penchant for wearing a hoodie. The criticisms are not without merit. The late Steve Jobs could proudly sport his “uniform” of black turtlenecks and black jeans, but Jobs and Apple had a proven track record of success that spanned both the consumer and corporate market segments. If Zuckerberg expects Facebook to be taken seriously he’ll have to signal his intentions by targeting a larger and more diversified customer base.
In another potential setback for Facebook, games maker Zynga’s stock price dropped by five percent, impacted according to some investors, because of insider sell-offs and dwindling numbers of users who are playing the company’s staple online games like “Farmville,” “Zynga Poker” and “Draw Something.” There is no doubt that Zynga has been a cash cow for Facebook which has helped propel its popularity. But the social games market is cyclical and extremely sensitive to user fads and whims; it is not a reliable source of long-term recurring revenue. Zynga’s fortunes are subject to sharp reversals. This trend is reinforced by less experienced investors who panic at the first sign of weakness. If one high technology bellwether stock performs badly on a given day, it will create a domino effect with investors downgrading the entire market sector. Zynga could just as easily be back on top next week with a new online social game that catches the public’s fancy and helps spur an advertising boom on Facebook, but that’s not something Facebook can count on.
Diversification is another element that’s pivotal for Facebook’s immediate and long term success. It must have a strong, variegated portfolio of products and partnerships.
Wooing Wall Street, corporate partners and making strategic acquisitions and investments in mobile and business applications, must be a top priority for Facebook. It will also have to satisfactorily respond to any SEC investigation. Zuckerberg can’t move quickly enough. Otherwise, Facebook could crash and burn faster than the Hindenburg and suffer the blowback from angry users who are in no mood to be sociable.